For citation: Shestov B.N. (2017) Sposoby manipulyativnogo vozdeystviya posredstvom vizualizatsii dannykh v sovremennykh SMI [Methods of Manipulation through Visualizing Data in Today's Media]. Mediaskop4. (in Russian). Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/2377
© Boris N. Shestov
PhD student at the Chair of Political Sciences of the Faculty of Law, Saratov Chernyshevsky State University (Saratov, Russia), bord64@gmail.com
Abstract
The article examines the main methods for graphical data representation used by media. In order to influence the audience, these data are often presented incorrectly. Often, these examples can be seen on TV, as images with graphics change rather quickly and the audience, provided with insufficient time for a detailed examination of the information, is forced to agree with the conclusions proposed by the media. However, illustrations intentionally or accidentally misleading unprepared reader are often found even in print media. Sometimes, author of the material, not perfectly versed in the matter, makes incorrect conclusions from various charts or graphs by mistake. Thus, the analysis of the methods of manipulation with the data not only allows finding an error in different materials of the media, but helps researchers to get the correct graphical data themselves as well. The author analyzes a number of examples and explains what needs to be changed to obtain graphics, which is correct in terms of statistics. The article concludes that despite the fact that the presence of a variety of data in graphic form makes the provided material more obvious and justified, critical approach to this kind of information is necessary.
Keywords: mass media, political manipulation, graphics, numerical data, statistics.
Notes
Chiqui E. (2015) A Quick Guide to Spotting Graphics That Lie. Available at: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/06/150619-data-points-five-ways-to-lie-with-charts/ (aссessed: 21.11.2016).
Craven T. LIS 504. Graphic displays of data. Available at: http://publish.uwo.ca/~craven/504/504gra.htm
Methodology Manual: Data Analysis: Displaying Data − Deception with Graphs. Texas State Auditor's Office. Jan 4, 1996. Archived from the original on 2003-04-02. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20030402093134/http://www.sao.state.tx.us/Resources/Manuals/Method/data/12DECEPD.pdf
Misleading Graphs: Real Life Examples. Available at: http://www.statisticshowto.com/misleading-graphs/ (aссessed: 10.10.2016).
OX News Chart Fails Math. Available at: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/FOX-News-Chart-Fails-Math-73711092.html
References
D'yakova E.G, Trakhtenberg A.D. (2001) Massovaya kommunikatsiya: modeli vliyaniya. Kak formiruetsya povestka dnya? [Mass Communication: Models of Influence. How Is Media Agenda Formed]. Ekaterinburg: Humanitarian Univ., Inst. of Philosophy and Law, UrB RAS Publ.
Frolova T.I. (2014) Gumanitarnaya povestka obshcherossiyskoy gazetnoy periodiki: kontseptsiya i analiz praktik [Chapter «Society» in All-Russian Periodical Press: Conception and Practical Analysis]. Mediaskop 4. (in Russian). Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/1594
Garbuznyak A.Yu. (2015) Povestka dnya SMI kak tekhnologiya interpretatsii [Media Agenda as a Technology of Interpreting]. Mediaskop 1. (in Russian). Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/1684
Kazakov A.A. (2015) Atributivnye povestki dnya i freymy «Rossiyskoy gazety» i «Novoy gazety» v kontekste metodov vozdeystviya na auditoriyu (na primere osveshcheniya konflikta na yugo-vostoke Ukrainy) [Attribute Agendas and Frames of the Rossiyskaya Gazeta and Novaya Gazeta Newspapers within the Context of Methods for Affecting the Audience (a case study of the coverage of the conflict in South-East Ukraine)]. Mediaskop 2. (in Russian). Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/1706
Kazakov A.A. (2012) Teoretiko-metodologicheskiy potentsial kategorii «mediynaya povestka dnya»: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya [Theoretical and Methodological Potential of the "Media Agenda" Category: Possibilities and Limitations]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya 1: 138−143.
Lang G.E., Lang K., Wilhout G.C., de Bock H. (1981) Watergate: An exploration of the agenda-building process. Mass Communication Review Yearbook, vol. 2, pp. 447–468.
McCombs M. (2004) Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Malden, Polity Press.
Rogers E., Dearing J. (1988) Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? Communication Yearbook, vol. 11, pp. 555–594.
Sheafer T., Weimann G. (2005) Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: An analysis of four Israeli elections. Journal of Communication 55: 347–365.
Tufte E. R. (2006) The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Graphics Press.
Weaver D. (2007) Thought on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication 57: 142–147.
Zhilyakova N.V. (2013) Formirovanie informatsionnoy povestki dnya v provintsial'noy periodike (na primere tomskoy gazety «Sibirskaya zhizn'», 1910 g.) [News Agenda Setting in Provincial Periodicals (a case study of the Tomsk newspaper Siberian Life, 1910)]. Mediaskop 3. (in Russian). Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/1383