For citation: Gavra D.P., Naumenko X.A. (2020) Koncept «mediasistema» v sovremennoj teorii massovyh kommunikacij [Concept of Media System in the Contemporary Mass Communication Theory]. Mediaskop 1. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/2611
DOI: 10.30547/mediascope.1.2020.5
@ Dmitrij P. Gavra
Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Head of the Chair of Public Relations in Business at the School of Journalism and Mass Communications, Saint Petersburg State University (Saint Petersburg, Russia), d.gavra@spbu.ru
@ Xenia A. Naumenko
PhD student at the Chair of Public Relations in Business at the School of Journalism and Mass Communications, Saint Petersburg State University (Saint Petersburg, Russia), ksnsun@mail.ru
Abstract
The article offers conceptual approaches to the interpretation of the “media system” concept in relation to the emerging network society. A critical analysis of approaches to understanding media systems in the modern theory of mass communications is carried out, methodological problems in the use of this term are identified. The authors propose to overcome the contradictions in the theoretical operationalization of the media system concept by introducing its dualistic interpretation suggesting two paradigmatic dimensions - substantial and societal.
In the substantial paradigm, it is proposed to consider the media system as a set of media actors with similar functionality, playing according to general rules within the range of these rules. In this paradigm, the media system is always tied to a specific territory (region, state) or organization, and its functioning is determined by a set of legal and normative regulators.
The second paradigm line, called societal, involves the consideration of the media system as a special social subsystem that interacts with other social subsystems, primarily political and economic. In the framework of this tradition the media system is understood as a complex of media institutions and media actors, their relations with other institutions and the audience, regulatory norms and values, which together ensure the realization of a necessary need for socially significant information.
The article also addresses the issue of system characteristics of the phenomenon under consideration.
Keywords: media system, mass communication, media theory, comparative media research, ontology of media systems.
Notes
Politicheskaja sistema [Political system]. In: Ivin A.A. (ed.) (2004) Filosofija. Jenciklopedicheskij slovar' [Philosophy. Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Gardariki Publ. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/946
Sistema [System]. In: Il'ichjov L.F., Fedoseev P.N., Kovaljov S.N., Panov V.G. (eds.) (1983) Filosofskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar' [Philosophical Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Sovetskaja jenciklopedija Publ. Available at: http://philosophy.niv.ru/doc/dictionary/philosophical/articles/475/sistema.htm
References
Almond G., Verba S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton University Press.
Bastiansen H.G. (2008) Media History and the Study of Media Systems. Media History 14 (1): 95−112.
Bodrunova S.S. Mediakratija: SMI i vlast' v sovremennyh demokraticheskih obshhestvah: dis. .... d-ra polit. nauk [Mediacracy: Mass Media and Power in Modern Democratic Societies: Dr. polit. scie. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2015.
Brüggemann M., Engesser S., Büchel F., Humprecht E. et al. (2014) Hallin and Mancini Revisited: Four Empirical Types of Western Media Systems. Journal of Communication 64 (6): 1037−1065. DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12127
Curran J. (2010) Media and Society. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dobek-Ostrowska B., Głowacki M. (2010) Comparative Media Systems: European and Global Perspectives. Central European University Press.
Downey J., Mihelj S. (eds.) (2012) Central and Eastern European Media in Comparative Perspective: Politics, Economy and Culture. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Easton D. (1953) The Political System. An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. New York: Knopf.
Engesser S., Franzetti A. (2011) Media Systems and Political Systems: Dimensions of Comparison. International Communication Gazette 73 (4): 273−301.
Filippova V.A. (2014) Mediasistemy Rossii i Brazilii na sovremennom jetape massovoj kommunikacii [Mediasystems of Russia and Brazil at the Contemporary Stage of Mass Communication]. In: Materialy. XVII Vserossijskoj ob#edinennoj konferencii «Internet i sovremennoe obshhestvo». Sankt-Peterburg, 19−20 nojabrja 2014 g. [Materials of the XVII Russian National Joint Conference ‘Internet and Modern Society’. Saint Petersburg, November 19‒20, 2014]. St. Petersburg: ITMO Publ., pp. 89−98.
Flew T., Waisbord S. (2015) The Ongoing Significance of National Media Systems in the Context of Media Globalization. Media, Culture & Society 37 (4): 620−636.
Grigoriev I.V. (2018) Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya latinoamerikanskoy modeli mediasistem (na primere SMI Paragvaya) [Peculiarities of Functioning of the Latin American Model of Media Systems (on the example of Paraguay)]. Mediaskop 4. (in Russian). Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/2486 DOI: 10.30547/mediascope.4.2018.4
Gross P. (2008) Forward to the Past: The Intractable Problems of Romania's Media System. The International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (2): 141−152.
DOI: 10.1177/1940161208314807
Guerrero M.A. (2014) The 'Captured Liberal'Model of Media Systems in Latin America.In: Media Systems and Communication policies in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 43−65.
Hallin D.C., Mancini P. (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Hallin D.C., Mancini P. (2017) Ten Years After Comparing Media Systems: What Have We Learned? Political Communication 34 (2): 155−171. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1233158
Hardy J. (2012) Comparing Media Systems. In: Esser F., Hanitzsch T. (eds.) Handbook of Comparative Communication Research. London: Routledge, pp. 185–206.
Jakubowicz K., Sükösd M. (2008) Twelve Concepts Regarding Media System Evolution and Democratization in Post-Communist Societies. In: Finding the Right Place on the Map. Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global