Languages

You are here

The Digital Divide in the Paradigm of the Scientific Debate in Germany

Научные исследования: 
Выпуски: 

 

For citation: Voronenkova G.F. (2016) Tsifrovoe neravenstvo v paradigme nauchnykh diskussiy v Germanii [The Digital Divide in the Paradigm of the Scientific Debate in Germany]. Mediaskop 4. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/2200

 

The material was prepared on the basis of the report presented during the round table "Digital inequality in Russia and Europe: 20 years of raising questions and looking for solutions", which was devoted to the 20th anniversary or Russian membership in the Council of Europe. The round table discussions took place at the Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University on the 25th of February, 2016.

 

© Galina F. Voronenkova
PhD, Professor at the Chair of Foreign Journalism and Literature, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Director of the Free Russian-German Institute for Journalism (FRDIP) (Moscow, Russia), galina-f-w@ya.ru

 

Abstract

The article discusses the attitude to the problem of digital divide in Germany, to overcome it from the point of view of the ethnographic factor, the analysis of subjects and content of scientific discussions of German researchers shows the vectors of their research for different social groups in the near future.

Keywords: digital divide, digital gap, Diffusion of innovations, Germany, scientific discussions, categories: digital divide, diffusion of innovation, the structure of the audience and target group.

 

Notes

Feierabend S., Klingler W. Was Kinder sehen: Fernsehenutzung Drei- bis 13-Jaeriger 2013 [What Children Watch: TV Users from 3 to 13 Years Old - 2013]. Media Perspektiven, 2014, Nr. 4, S.182−194.

Feierabend S., Klingler W. Was Kinder sehen: Fernsehenutzung Drei- bis 13-Jaeriger 2015 [What Children Watch: TV Users from 3 to 13 Years Old - 2015]. Media Perspektiven, 2014, Nr.4, S. 174−185.

Feierabend S., Plankenhorn T., Ratgeb T. KIM-Studie 2014: Kinder und Medien, Computer und Internet [KIM-research: Children and Mass Media, Computer and the Internet]. Media Perspektiven, 2015, Nr. 4, S. 185–198.

Media Perspektiven. Basisdaten [Media Perspectives. Final Dates]. 2013. S. 82.

Mediennutzung und Medienkompetenz in jungen Lebenswerlten: Onlinebefragung von 14- bis 29-Jaerigen [The Use of Mass Media and Media Competence of the Young Generation: Online Poll among the Youth Aged 14-29]. Media Perspektiven,2014, Nr. 4, S.195−218.

Motive und Funktionen der Internetnutzung [Motives and Functions of the Internet Use]. Media Perspektiven, 2014, Nr. 5.

Schmidt H.″Digitale Strategie 2025″: Sigmar Gabriels Masterplan für ein digitales Deutschland. 2016. 14 März [Digital Strategy 2025: Master Plan of Sigmar Gabriel on Digital Germany. 2016. 14 марта]. Available at: //https://netzoekonom.de/2016/03/14/digitale-strategie-2025-sigmar-gabriels-masterplan-fuer-ein-digitales-deutschland/

Schulz W. Folgen "neuer Medien" fuer demokratische Prozesse [Consequences of the New Media for the Democratic Processes]. Media Perspektiven, 2015, Nr. 4, S. 211.

http://www.iis.ru/library/okinawa/charter.ru.html

http://www.iis.ru/library/okinawa/charter.ru.html

http://www.heute.de/ard-zdf-online-studie-deutsche-nutzen-internet-vielfaeltiger-40469842.html

http://meedia.de/2016/02/19/28-millionen-deutsche-nutzen-facebook-aber-twitter-in-japan-vor-dem-social-network/

 

 

References

Hilbert M. (November). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Women's Studies International Forum, 34 (6): 479−489. Available at: //http://dx.doi.org/10.101 6/j.wsif.2011.07.001

Meyen M., Löblich M., Pfaff-Rüdiger S., Riesmeyer C. (2011) Qualitative Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft[Quality Research Methods in Communication Science].Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Zillien N., Haufs-Brusberg M. (2014) Wissenskluft und Digital Divide [Scientific Barrier and Digital Inequality]. Baden-Baden: NomosVerlagsgesellschaft.